A Counsel's Note to the Board
Considered Advice on Technology Risk and Governance
We place your organisation's technology exposures onto a single readable page — and help the people responsible for oversight understand what they are reading. No framework theatre. No register inflation. A written view, clearly argued.
— Services
Three Engagements, Each with a Written Deliverable
Technology Risk Posture Conversation
A short advisory engagement that places the organisation's technology risk posture onto a single readable page. We catalogue principal exposures — operational, regulatory, vendor, security, talent — and weigh each against the controls in place.
- Written posture note, not a register
- Suitable for board risk committee preparation
- Plain prose, no scoring theatre
Technology Governance Advisory
A longer engagement examining your organisation's technology governance customs — committee structure, approval processes for material change, executive-to-board relationships, and the small documentation habits that record decisions.
- Written governance review with sequenced recommendations
- Suited for regulatory review preparation
- Deliberate governance uplift focus
Risk Committee Workshop
A two-day workshop for executives and board members attending a technology risk committee. We examine the customs of the committee — the agenda, supporting papers, manner of presenting risk, and rhythm of decision-making — and write practical refinements together.
- Written committee handbook for the chair
- Refines existing customs, not wholesale framework replacement
- Two full days, board and executive attendance
— Why Layar Consult
What Distinguishes Careful Advisory from Routine Consulting
Written Outputs, Always
Every engagement concludes with a document the board can carry into its next meeting — not a slide deck designed to impress, but a written note designed to inform.
Counsel Perspective
Our advisers approach technology risk as senior counsel, not as vendors. We name the exposures plainly, note the controls with candour, and leave the organisation better placed to decide.
Regulatory Familiarity
We are familiar with the expectations of Malaysian regulatory bodies — BNM, SC, SSM — and write with those expectations present rather than discovered after the fact.
Focused Scope
Each engagement has a defined beginning and a defined end. We do not create dependency or extend scope without a fresh conversation.
Board-Level Fluency
We write for directors and audit committee members who are accountable for what they oversee. The language is measured to that audience, not to a technical reader.
No Conflict of Interest
We do not sell software, infrastructure or implementation services. Our sole interest is that the organisation understands its position clearly.
— A Word Before We Begin
Is Your Board Adequately Briefed on Technology Exposure?
Many boards receive technology reports that are detailed but not readable. We can help place the substance of those reports into a form the oversight function actually needs. A short preliminary conversation costs nothing and commits no one.
— Frequently Asked
Matters Often Raised Before Engagement
What kind of organisations do you typically advise?
How long does an engagement take?
What is the form of the final deliverable?
Do you implement the recommendations you make?
What information do you need to begin?
Are your fees fixed or variable?
— Our Location
Find Us in Kuala Lumpur
— Correspondence
Begin a Conversation
Contact Details
-
Telephone
+60 3 2873 5491 -
Email
[email protected] -
Office
Menara Hap Seng
Jalan P Ramlee
50250 Kuala Lumpur -
Office Hours
Monday – Friday
9:00 am – 6:00 pm MYT
Appointments preferred